Fortellar

You don't need another SOC vendor. You need detection and response built on the program you already have.

Security Operations & Monitoring is the running execution layer. 24×7 detection and response, threat hunting on cadence, incident handling integrated with your IR playbook, and audit evidence captured in the same pipeline that feeds your compliance program. One operating model, two outcomes.

Why This Matters

A SOC running on stock alerts is reactive operations. A SOC running on your program is strategic posture.

Most managed-security relationships sell hours of analyst time. The output is tickets. The escalation is a phone call. The detection rules are inherited from the vendor's library, not tuned to your environment. The analyst on shift has never seen your application architecture, your customer data flow, or your incident playbook. By the time the ticket reaches you, the context has been stripped, the priority is wrong, and the response is reconstructed from the SIEM rather than driven by your program.

The work is operating the program you already have, on a 24×7 cadence. Detection rules tuned to your environment, not to a stock catalog. Analysts with continuity across incidents, audits, and quarterly reviews. Playbooks written for your specific business and rehearsed before they are needed. Evidence captured in the same pipeline that feeds your auditor. One operating model, two outcomes. The SOC and the compliance program draw from a single source of truth.

What a stock SOC misses
01

Tuning

Detection inherited from a vendor library was not written for your environment.

02

Continuity

Analysts who have never seen your architecture rebuild context every shift.

03

Playbooks

Response reconstructed from the SIEM instead of driven by your program.

04

Evidence

Operational output that never reaches the pipeline your auditor reads.

Who this is for

Three situations where the SOC needs to be operating, not staffing.

Situation 01

Need 24×7 coverage, can't staff a SOC internally

Your environment runs around the clock. The threats do too. Building a 24×7 internal SOC takes a senior hire, three follow-the-sun analyst roles, a SIEM team, and an engineering manager. The math does not work at your current scale, and waiting until it does is exposure.

The outcome24×7 detection and response, operated by a named team, on the program your in-house security lead chairs.
Situation 02

Current MSSP relationship isn't working

You have a SOC vendor. They send tickets. The analysts rotate. The detection rules have not been tuned in 18 months. The post-incident review last quarter surfaced a gap they could not explain. The contract renewal is in 90 days.

The outcomeA continuity-led handoff to a SOC operating the same program you already invested in, with detection rules tuned to your environment from day one.
Situation 03

Building toward continuous compliance

The compliance program is moving to evidence-as-it-happens. The SOC has to be a first-class evidence source: detection coverage mapped to controls, response actions logged for audit, monthly metrics flowing into the GRC forum.

The outcomeSOC operations and compliance evidence converging on one pipeline. The auditor walks the same telemetry the SOC operates on, with the same definitions and the same retention.
What's included

A SOC that is actually running, and connected to your program.

24×7 detection and response on your environment

Coverage across endpoint, network, cloud control plane, identity, and application layers. Follow-the-sun analyst rotation with continuity across shifts.

Detection rules tuned to your environment

Stock catalog as a starting point, your environment as the design target. Rules version-controlled, tested, and refined on a quarterly cadence against the threats actually reaching your sector.

A named analyst team

Tier-1 and tier-2 analysts you know by name. Continuity across incidents, audits, and quarterly reviews. The escalation path is a person, not a queue.

Playbook-driven response

Incident playbooks written for your environment, rehearsed in tabletops, and executed during real incidents. Actions logged in the IR record for post-mortem and audit.

Threat hunting on cadence

Monthly hunts based on threat intelligence and your environment's profile. Hunt findings feed back into detection rules, not back into a report.

A compliance evidence pipeline

Detection coverage, response actions, and SOC metrics captured against the controls in your framework. The auditor walks the same data the SOC operates on.

Monthly and quarterly reviews

A monthly SOC report sized for the working group, a quarterly review sized for the executive. Trends, gaps, tuning recommendations, threat-landscape changes, all on the agenda.

A path to in-source when you're ready

If the org scales to where an internal SOC is the right answer, we hand off. Detection rules, playbooks, evidence pipeline, runbooks. Your team starts where we left off, not from scratch.

How it works

Four phases. Scoped to your environment, your program, and your operating cadence.

Phase 01

Onboard

Log sources mapped, telemetry ingested, environment documented, business context written down. Detection coverage assessed against your sector's threats and your existing security program. The starting point is read, not assumed.

You walk away with
  • A documented log source inventory and ingestion plan.
  • A current-state detection coverage map against MITRE ATT&CK.
  • An environment runbook for the analyst team to operate from.
Phase 02

Stand up

Detection rules tuned, playbooks adapted to your environment, escalation paths defined, evidence pipeline wired into the compliance program. The named analyst team is briefed, drilled, and live before the engagement transitions to 24×7.

You walk away with
  • A tuned detection ruleset, version-controlled.
  • Incident response playbooks adapted to your environment.
  • A live evidence pipeline mapped to your compliance frameworks.
Phase 03

Operate

24×7 detection and response. Threat hunting on cadence. Threat intelligence translated into detections and curriculum. Monthly working-group reports. Quarterly executive reviews. Continuous tuning against the threat landscape and your environment's changes.

You walk away with
  • A monthly SOC report for the working group.
  • A quarterly executive review tied to the program roadmap.
  • A live audit evidence base, captured continuously.
Phase 04

Evolve

The SOC scales as your environment does. New cloud workloads, new business lines, new compliance scope, new acquisitions. The operating model absorbs the change without rebuilding the program underneath it.

You walk away with
  • An annual SOC operating-model review.
  • A defined evolution path: scope changes, in-source handoff, or hybrid arrangements.
  • Continuity of evidence across the change.
Expertise this work draws on

The components behind a SOC that operates a program.

Technology & Security Operations

Threat Detection Engineering

Detection rule design, MITRE ATT&CK coverage mapping, hunt-driven refinement, and the version control discipline that makes tuning continuous rather than annual.

See expertise
Technology & Security Operations

Incident Response Operations

Playbook design, response automation, containment and recovery procedures executed against your IR program, and the post-incident review discipline that turns each event into rule improvements.

See expertise
Technology & Security Operations

Logging & Observability Engineering

Telemetry pipeline design, retention sized to framework windows, search performance tuned for live operations, and the cost-control discipline that keeps observability spend matched to detection value.

See expertise
Cybersecurity & Compliance

Compliance Evidence Engineering

Detection coverage and response actions mapped to the controls in your compliance frameworks. The SOC operation produces audit-grade evidence as a byproduct, not as a separate report.

See expertise

A SOC that doesn't know your program is a delay, not a defense.

Thirty minutes with a senior partner. Bring the environment, the current SOC arrangement, and the compliance program you report against. We will tell you what continuity actually buys.